Comments on: Frankenstein (1910) https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/ Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:33:51 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Linus Olsson https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-215230 Wed, 18 Oct 2017 16:33:51 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-215230 In reply to Charles.

I know I’m currently replying to a 4 years old comment but I just have to point out that A Trip To The Moon had special effects before this and probably some movies before that. But for the time these effects were really good

]]> By: Tom F https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-201747 Tue, 19 Jul 2016 18:06:02 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-201747 In reply to Fouad Abozyid.

It’s 13 minutes.

]]> By: Dyscourse | Indie Gamer Chick https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-179474 Wed, 20 May 2015 10:35:12 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-179474 […] main character Rita looked like an anamorphic scarecrow made of wood. I thought Teddy looked like 1910 Frankenstein. The character models were just bizarre. To put it in perspective, my boyfriend created this […]

]]> By: It’s That Time of the Year Horror Fans! | Mark Burchick https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-148572 Thu, 19 Dec 2013 05:18:04 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-148572 […] example, the earliest film that Rolfe has reviewed is the 1910 version of Frankenstein, which is now over 100 years old. As he notes in his review, the film was so shocking […]

]]> By: It’s That Time of the Year Horror Fans! | The Baltimore Film Guide https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-140946 Fri, 27 Sep 2013 22:05:27 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-140946 […] example, the earliest film that Rolfe has reviewed is the 1910 version of Frankenstein, which is now over 100 years old. As he notes in his review, the film was so shocking […]

]]> By: Charles https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-139100 Sat, 24 Aug 2013 22:05:45 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-139100 That was great special effects for the time, maybe the first special effects of all time. Consider watching this short movie, its worth your time. This was also the first notable performance of the forgotten hollywood star, Mary Fuller.

]]> By: Fouad Abozyid https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-138146 Tue, 06 Aug 2013 19:15:46 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-138146 In reply to CarreyFan23.

13 minutes? it was 1 our

]]> By: jamesc72 https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-116141 Mon, 30 Jul 2012 00:25:38 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-116141 What is the name of the song at the beginning?

]]> By: Lyra_Heartstrings https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-83622 Mon, 12 Dec 2011 02:58:56 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-83622 The picture of the monster before the video starts is pretty funny, for some reason.

]]> By: penpan https://cinemassacre.com/2009/10/01/01-frankenstein-1910/#comment-57569 Sat, 27 Aug 2011 22:35:42 +0000 http://test.cinemassacre.com/?p=398#comment-57569 MASTERPIECE. Old films are the best!

]]>