Comments on: VHS Generation loss https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/ Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:50:52 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Waldemar Sha https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-209996 Sun, 19 Mar 2017 16:50:52 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-209996 If you copy a random VHS 666 times, Satan will apear on the screen and give you a recipe of cake…
it’s tasty.

]]>
By: DROP THERAPY https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-200525 Thu, 09 Jun 2016 01:34:40 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-200525 that tape is dying.

]]>
By: Don Skiver https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-177546 Sun, 05 Apr 2015 20:25:16 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-177546 Ahh… I like how the music has wow and flutter due to the uneven stretching of the tape medium as it is recorded… That’s what makes analog stuff so cool; the various imperfections is what makes it unique.

]]>
By: Stefano Pavone https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-177115 Sun, 29 Mar 2015 17:00:17 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-177115 I count between 52 and 64 copies/transfers before both the audio AND the video become completely garbled and impossible to identify (I’m amazed the audio lasted longer than the video did).

]]>
By: brett dennis https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-160196 Wed, 09 Jul 2014 15:16:30 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-160196 dam thats gets really shity teehee

]]>
By: How’s it hangin? | CraftOtaku.com https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-158432 Thu, 12 Jun 2014 18:55:39 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-158432 […] up a VHS of a fansub and an import game cartridge. And the VHS was horrible quality because it was a 5th or 6th generation recording of another VHS if you were lucky. So you counted yourself lucky if you didn’t have a seizure just from the […]

]]>
By: Nicholas Lombardi https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-139834 Mon, 09 Sep 2013 20:01:51 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-139834 This ends up getting creepy

]]>
By: VHS generational loss experiment | Global Grind https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-137263 Fri, 12 Jul 2013 11:58:56 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-137263 […] over at Cinemassacre undertook to find out how many times you could copy VHS footage before it became completely […]

]]>
By: jay bob https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-134743 Sat, 18 May 2013 09:37:56 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-134743 http://steamgamesfree.com/?ref=vKoxHs4sd

]]>
By: madthedj https://cinemassacre.com/2010/05/26/vhs-generation-loss/#comment-130115 Sat, 09 Mar 2013 06:16:15 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=6208#comment-130115 I may be off by 1 or 2, but I counted 64 copies made in total before the video ends, not including the original version at the start. Now, James says he went back and forth between two VHS tapes during the experiment. I wonder if the quality between generations would last longer if each new copy was on a brand new blank tape (rather than a tape recorded on repeatedly). Maybe someday someone else with too much time on his hands can try wasting 100 tapes on that experiment! 🙂

]]>