https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/ Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:17:20 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-29489 Thu, 16 Dec 2010 19:17:20 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-29489 Very interesting. Confusing and clarifying at the same time.

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-27468 Mon, 29 Nov 2010 13:11:36 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-27468 I was suspicious of this chart at first and though I could smell boom, but am going to check it out http://www.vizzed.com/vizzedboard/vizzedindex.php?ref=65348

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-27219 Thu, 25 Nov 2010 15:50:58 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-27219 They didn’t forget about Marty and Jen leaving 1985 to not exist in 2015. They simply said 2015 Marty and Jen already returned. So they will always exist in 2015. Even if the past selves leave it.

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26853 Mon, 22 Nov 2010 15:06:37 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26853 @bend3r and why if biff went to the past in 2015 gave the book to biff 1955 why did the future not change by the time old biff got back??i know like you said bad writing but it really bugs me =(

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26691 Sat, 20 Nov 2010 02:07:29 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26691 @Juno
The true answer to that question is bad writing. The first movie was made with no intention of making squeal let alone a trilogy. When they came back to work on the second movie they realised they had written themselves into a major plot hole, but just ignored it and moved on. It’s weird because almost no one ever points it out 🙂

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26637 Fri, 19 Nov 2010 05:26:18 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26637 I have a question?after number 1 doc leaves to 2015 right there is no doc between 1985 and 2015??then why in number two when Marty leaves from 1985 to 2015 there is an older him and he has kids, he just jumped 30 years he didn’t exist in that time period so why would he be in 2015 as old him , he left in 1985 so there would be no Marty between 1985 and 2015 so why is he there??

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26404 Wed, 17 Nov 2010 17:15:54 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26404 Man the more i think about the timeline of this movie the more confused and mind boggled i get

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26337 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 18:26:58 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26337 The only thing that ever bothered me about the series was in the third movie when Marty travels back to 1885. His great (great?) grandmother wouldn’t have looked like his mother unless there’s some serious inbreeding going on.

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26309 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 06:12:42 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26309 Check out “Biff’s Complete Biography” — http://www.firstshowing.net/2010/11/14/watch-biffs-entire-biography-from-back-to-the-future-part-ii/

]]> https://cinemassacre.com/2010/11/14/back-to-the-future-timeline/#comment-26308 Tue, 16 Nov 2010 05:58:49 +0000 http://www.cinemassacre.com/?p=8316#comment-26308 I’ve already seen this timeline on the regular Wikipedia, but I DO love the way it’s done. …I love being a nerd. B)

]]>