Comments on: Bram Stoker’s Dracula (1992) https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/ Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:55:38 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Jacob Boeve https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-214919 Mon, 02 Oct 2017 18:55:38 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-214919 Keanu Reeves’s acting is always wooden 😐

]]>
By: Jacob Boeve https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-205074 Sun, 23 Oct 2016 01:47:54 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-205074 Keanu Reeves’ acting is always wooden. The puppets in the Puppet Master movies are more emotionally animated than he is.

]]>
By: Sirkrozz https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-203773 Sun, 02 Oct 2016 13:43:21 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-203773 There are 3 things that got my attention on this film:

1- The storytelling has a graphic novel rhythm and structure I have yet to see in another movie.
– The eyes in the background set an example on the way different elements fuse and set the pacing of the story during the whole film: *you* are seeing in the background what the characters in the front are thinking/reading… and that’s quite the feat, lemme tell ya).

2- The writing is AMAZING.
Almost every single spoken line in this movie bears a double meaning, and you could find a really different film based on all the possible ways you can build the story with this. Comic book enthusiasts should quickly take notice on this and watch the whole movie again.

3- Gary Oldman is THE SHIT; hell, which other actor nowadays could claim such versatility, having almost a natural knack for fleshed-out villains, and yet ending up so close to people’s feelings “even though it’s such a monster”..?

This movie is a living, breathing graphic novel.
And that is great in my book.
I’d love to see its storyboards…

]]>
By: RageJoona https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-196113 Tue, 23 Feb 2016 20:24:50 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-196113 It’s funny how this is one of the extremely rare examples of a Dracula movie that has Quincey Morris in it. I don’t know why but he’s ignored in pretty much every film adaption.

]]>
By: Sam Wood https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-182066 Tue, 14 Jul 2015 17:52:16 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-182066 Great video as always James. I’d really like to hear your thoughts on Mary Shelley’s Frankenstein (1994).

]]>
By: M. Ryan https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-178040 Mon, 13 Apr 2015 03:55:04 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-178040 No mention of Anthony Hopkins, the only actor from the old school that legitimizes the film? He acts his ass off in this too.

]]>
By: Sondre Linde https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-176272 Thu, 12 Mar 2015 16:18:11 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-176272 There’s been so many Dracula movies that it’s almost impossible to keep.. Tracula!

]]>
By: Claude Lilford https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-176125 Wed, 11 Mar 2015 03:05:12 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-176125 In reply to Zeldas Champion.

Why did they keep giving him big roles again?

]]>
By: Seth Switzer https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-169022 Sat, 08 Nov 2014 17:57:34 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-169022 I’m a big fan of Bela Lugosi and think he is the best Dracula. When I watched this movie I thought it was terrible and so boring. This is definitely my least favorite Dracula movie.

]]>
By: Paul Church https://cinemassacre.com/2014/10/17/bram-stokers-dracula-1992/#comment-168365 Sun, 02 Nov 2014 18:26:15 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=28285#comment-168365 This Movie should have been called Oldman vs. Hopkins: Deathmatch

]]>