Comments on: Stephen King’s IT (1990)

By: Chuck Rogers

Chuck Rogers — Mon, 31 Oct 2016 19:36:43 +0000

Hahaha, I’, so glad you mentioned the thing about the double sided DVD, I let my friend borrow my copy a few years ago without thinking about it, and it turned out he only watched part 2 of the movie! It was like a little bonus episode of you know what’s bullshit lol!

By: Scapegoat_Skeletor

Scapegoat_Skeletor — Mon, 04 Jan 2016 16:47:39 +0000

I encountered that two-sided disk problem also, it’s ruined the movie for me. I guess the end’s still my favorite part.

By: Steven Posey

Steven Posey — Fri, 30 Oct 2015 07:19:07 +0000

Best movie ever

By: Hector Ruiz

Hector Ruiz — Fri, 23 Oct 2015 23:53:02 +0000

Great stuff here nerd!!! Love every review you do. Thanks. : )

By: tr4rules

tr4rules — Sun, 11 Oct 2015 05:51:30 +0000

I had never seen it, until I was an adult, and the whole two-sided disc thing is exactly what happened to me and my friends. We watched side one which is the begging and it ends with no credits and the dude in the tube, we were WTFing and pissed, but accepted it as the end. It seriously wasn’t intil a year latter when I came home from work and my brother was in my room and watching a movie I asked him what he was watching and he said “IT”. I said oh and began to watch it a little myself and noticed I didn’t recognize it at all, but just figured, eh remake or something and left. Then a few weeks later, while standing in line at a movie store I actually heard someone talking about the movie and it’s abrupt ending, they other said you are supposed to flip the disc. When I got home I went to my room and tried it and of course it was Part 2. I so pissed and when I let my friends know, they were also. But none cared enough to check it out, and I thought it was pretty much an ok movie on it’s on, but burnt by the whole two-sided bs.

By: mandm

mandm — Wed, 30 Sep 2015 18:06:22 +0000

For someone that considers himself as well-versed in movies this is in my opinion a really bad review. Someone doesn’t have to like this movie, but since there is a huge book behind it, there is a lot of stuff to talk about, especially about the cliché-stuff that is mentioned here. Of course the movie stands on his own, but in my opinion a cineast and horror-fan should at least spend some time on the book when he makes a review of the adaptation. Apart from that, there is no comment about the (award-winning) music what i also consider as a bad omission.

By: Christian Draughon

Christian Draughon — Fri, 25 Sep 2015 22:45:09 +0000

CINEMASSACRE IS AWESOME!

By: Stephanie Cutrere

Stephanie Cutrere — Wed, 19 Aug 2015 02:22:58 +0000

I do agree Warner Brothers butchered the DVD edition when they “Widescreened” it and cut the ending from part 1 and the beginning from part 2. Makes me wish I still had the 2 volume VHS edition but that damn VCR ate one of the cassettes and the single cassette version’s sound and vision was of lesser quality than the 2 volume set. I guess when Warner Brothers gets their planned R-Rated theatrical version green-lit we will see a definitive edition of the mini-series. Thanks James.

By: werewolf3004

werewolf3004 — Thu, 09 Apr 2015 05:53:21 +0000

I remember I was watching a nostalgia critic review of this movie and that did get me scared and that also made me laugh

By: Raymond mundy

Raymond mundy — Tue, 17 Mar 2015 03:25:21 +0000

I FUCKING SHIT MY PANTS WACHTING THAT SCARY MOVIES BUT I LOVE STEPHN KING MOVIE LIKE COJO