Comments on: The Wasp Woman (1959) https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/ Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:45:49 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Ian Finlay https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-210992 Thu, 20 Apr 2017 23:45:49 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-210992 1:00 Well THAT is a pretty in-fair criticism I’d say. I mean, for the 1950’s ( pre-“splatter” era ) THAT’s actually fairly graphic – more than allot of movies would show during THAT time period. And no, it isn’t so poorly done. You couldn’t tell it was “chockolate” syrup in a BLACK AND WHITE movie like this.

]]> By: Alex Huneault https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-187179 Fri, 09 Oct 2015 01:04:45 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-187179 WAAASSSSPINATOR LOVE THISSSS MOVIE! WAAASSSSSPINATOR GIVE IT A PLUSSSSS PLUSSSSS.

]]> By: Sweetdeath https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186977 Wed, 07 Oct 2015 11:04:12 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186977 Was the actress okay after they ripped off her mask and harmed her skin? Was she able to make another movie ever again?

]]> By: elvirus https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186835 Tue, 06 Oct 2015 12:03:17 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186835 In reply to Anthony Volk.

Agreed. They should definitely improve on their unscripted talents. I don’t understand why they move away from the obvious talent they have! Film-making…
And they ARE moving away!

]]> By: low_tone1 https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186765 Mon, 05 Oct 2015 20:22:18 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186765 Whenever the Wasp Woman turns her head, you can see the actresses bare neck. The mask does not extend down enough. This is a classic error in Ed Wood movies. I have to wonder if people wouldn’t give this movie more credit as a “so bad it’s good” film if Ed Wood had directed it.

]]> By: Adam Krimmel https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186611 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 22:26:33 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186611 In reply to Anthony Volk.

Same

]]> By: Smokingspoon https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186579 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 16:10:38 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186579 In reply to Anthony Volk.

Me too. The Ring one was fine, but I feel like they should search up at least some juicy info on a movie before doing it ‘unscripted’ in front of the camera. There was too much ‘uummm’ ‘yeaah’.

]]> By: Ben_from_G-town https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186542 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 14:09:44 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186542 Yeesh that movie does look pretty bad. I’ve never seen Attack of the Killer B Movies. As you said, it’s like a bad MST3K.

]]> By: Shaun Hurle https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186515 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 09:20:40 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186515 Good review James, keep them coming my friend!

]]> By: chris jackso https://cinemassacre.com/2015/10/02/the-wasp-woman-1959/#comment-186480 Sun, 04 Oct 2015 03:37:32 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=29930#comment-186480 In reply to Anthony Volk.

i prefer the scripted format as well and also agree that trying something new is never bad. i think james just needs to get more comfortable with it because it seems hes nervous about saying something he will regret. like me, james has such passion in making things exactly the way he sees it in his head and doing that on the spot is hard to do without practice. he goes back and revises everything he writes 10 times until it is good enough to be used. but sometimes just talking from the heart and not from the brain is just as, if not more, effective.

]]>