Comments on: Ghostbusters 2016. No Review. I refuse. https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/ Sun, 08 Oct 2017 05:33:28 +0000 hourly 1 https://wordpress.org/?v=5.5.3 By: Felix Suarez https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-215063 Sun, 08 Oct 2017 05:33:28 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-215063 In reply to M S.

How about you get out of the closet and quit being a cuck? Nobody has to do watch the movie. The movie had funny moments but, it was garbage. Quit your bitching and move on.

]]>
By: Kyle Harmon https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-205269 Wed, 26 Oct 2016 22:26:19 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-205269 Some of the responses to this review is just laughable to me. especially patton oswalt’s twitter comment about cinemassacre. I’ve read it and it doesn’t even make sense to me. but pretty much lost respect for him. its ok for him to make jokes about going back in time to kill George lucas to stop him making the new star wars movies. but a well thought opinion of why someone wont watch a movie for the cash grab it is isn’t ok. and that is what this movie is: a chance to make more money on a franchise on just the name alone. also if the original was an all female cast and the remake had an all male cast the feminists would have a fucking stroke.

]]>
By: Jeffrey S Piatt https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-202792 Tue, 30 Aug 2016 13:45:44 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-202792 came here from cracked.com you made an list. http://www.cracked.com/blog/6-racist-things-that-non-racistpeople-always-say/

]]>
By: Kevin Anderson https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-202591 Sun, 21 Aug 2016 10:59:57 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-202591 The only reason why James Rolfe refuses to review this movie is because he’s a sick perverted lil man boy who even doesn’t have good review shows. I mean look at it he excretes bowels on games he calls a load of crap that in itself is saying this man desperately is in need of a life. If you just have a show where you rent games just to shit on them, and then he posts this “review” that says he refuses to because it’s no good I mean come on! There is such a thing as living a life, if you’re one of these people like Trump who doesn’t like how others live their lives stay silent don’t go on YouTube ranting about I hate everything about how others have fun because my mommy and daddy never let me so now it’s society’s fault!

]]>
By: John E Miller https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201920 Tue, 26 Jul 2016 20:05:23 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201920 Dude, James is not movie reviewer. That is not his job. He is under no obligation to watch this film for any reason.

]]>
By: Michael Walls https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201763 Wed, 20 Jul 2016 04:04:22 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201763 Wow! You wanted to see the original cast but did you not notice that the original movie poster in your film is missing Ernie Hudson?! How can you diss on a movie you never saw, while reminiscing about a movie that has clearly been manipulated to represent a false version of what it is you think was so great. If your job is to review movies, then just suck it up and go watch the damn film! Let us then decide whether or not your review of the movie is accurate. But please don’t patronize the original Ghostbusters when it clearly had its own issues, as evidenced by removing Ernie Hudson from the movie poster.

]]>
By: Adam DeBuck https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201755 Wed, 20 Jul 2016 03:53:20 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201755 Just wait until your daughter turns six and you watch GB 2016 with her, James. You’ll be glad this movie existed. Hope to see a review then!

]]>
By: M S https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201721 Tue, 19 Jul 2016 00:23:10 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201721 In reply to Dan Rogers.

Geeez, get out of the basement and breathe some fresh air. Saw it, loved it, laughed a lot. The original cast all had cameos and had fun with it, even Harold Ramis was represented. The original was beloved but not sacrosanct . Great cast, It was good fun then and good fun now.

]]>
By: Titus Andrei https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201659 Sat, 16 Jul 2016 19:19:58 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201659 Agree, i prefer to remember the classic one ,not this crap

]]>
By: frank yowonske https://cinemassacre.com/2016/05/17/ghostbusters-2016-no-review-i-refuse/#comment-201655 Sat, 16 Jul 2016 13:41:29 +0000 http://cinemassacre.com/?p=30973#comment-201655 Great movie. saw it, will see again. It’s fun. It’s not reality it’s a movie. Enjoy it for that. Great characters, great special effects. Is it the greatest movie ever? Does it top the originals?
NO and NO. Nothing could! Is it a good time in a time with all the terror and violence around us to have a well deserved laugh? YES! Does it ride on the shirt tails of the original? sure, but who cares….original actors have cameo’s in it and thats fun as well.
Go in with an open mind and enjoy it. Have a laugh! The new characters are great and effects very good, especially in 3D.
Don’t listen to these bums who think into it too much. It’s a movie. Enjoy it for that.

]]>